A good question and I’m glad you asked.
Movies are
inextricably linked to time. It’s only the fact that our brains retain an image
on our eyeballs for a brief period – about 1/24th of a second – that
fools us into believing we are seeing smooth movement rather than a juddery
series of still images. The great movie star James Stewart described movies as
being like little moments frozen in time. This project is about what happens
when those frozen moments thaw.
The American
film academic Robert Allen has some interesting thoughts about movies, memory,
and space. He suggests that our memory is often enhanced by the design and
architecture of the space in which we view them. To be clear he is not talking
about the modern multiplex, a long soulless box with a white rectangle at one
end. He is talking about your opulent picture palace with lush lighting, vast
spaces, and a screen that made the audience completely subservient to the giant
image before them. It engaged the entire sensorium as a place where memories
were created and stored, and every repeat visit added to those which had gone
before.
It is worth bearing in mind that cinema spread faster and
across a wider demographic in Glasgow than almost any other city in the United Kingdom.
In 1913, for example, the city could boast 87,000 cinema seats between its
private and municipal venues. Most of these were in the working class schemes
and suburbs of the expanding city.
Although they were frequently surrounded by
tenements, these cinemas were the architectural jewels in the civic crown. Albert
Victor Gardner, the architect who designed many of them, was a disciple of
Frank Lloyd Wright and his work contained many nods to the American genius
which were often luxuriously at odds with their relatively meagre surroundings.
Gardner designed around 50 cinemas which can be found in suburbs such as
Springburn, Hillhead, Finnieston, and Govanhill, as well as small towns such as
Rothesay, Dunoon and Campbeltown.
Every
suburb or district had its own cinema. I grew up in the Sixties in the
4-in-a-block houses in Red Road in Balornock, where there were half a dozen
cinemas no further than a short bus ride away. In Townhead there was The
Carlton and The Casino, at Charing Cross there was The George, not far away was
The Vogue in Possilpark, The Kinema in Springburn Road, not to mention the recently
closed Wellfield in Springburn. Above them all was my own palace of cinematic
memories, The Princes in Gourlay Street, just off Springburn Road.
The
attraction between the local audience and its cinema was almost parochial. Few
went to see a particular film, most went to the same cinema at the same time,
often two or three times a week depending on programme changes. The elite city
centre venues were the homes of the first-run pristine releases, the local
cinema was a little more down market and since they were in working-class areas
they became proudly working class.
Professor Annette Kuhn has worked extensively in the field
of cinema memory,
including research in Glasgow, and her landmark work, An Everyday Magic,
suggests that social cohesion, of the sort evidenced in those memories, is a
prime example of the appeal of the cinematic space. She says that cinema going was regarded as part
of the routine of everyday life and was a strong driver of social identity. For the majority, going to the
pictures is remembered as being less about
films
and stars than about daily and weekly routines, and neighbourhood comings and
goings.
Recently I came across a similar sensation in my own life and that’s what prompted this case study. Basically I misremembered the first film I saw. This was the foundation myth of my entire career and most of my life and I had got it wrong – the full story will appear in due course, but it was a shock and it prompted me to look further.
Did my father and I really go to the Princes every week, sometimes twice? It felt that way. I turned 10 in 1966 and as I prepare to enter my eighth decade it seemed a good time to look back on what I remember and classify those memories according to Kuhn.
By the time I was 10 I had a rudimentary understanding of how cinema exhibition worked. I could find the listings pages in the Evening Times, I knew which hoardings advertised coming attractions, and basically, I was starting to educate myself as a cinemagoer, able to express some agency in what I wanted to see.
For the next year, using those Evening Times listing pages I’ll post a monthly blog at the end of each month looking back at the releases from that month in 1966. We should find a very different industry from the one we have today.
I’d like to invite you to join me as we discover the answer
to a question frequently asked by 10-year-old me: “What’s on at the pictures?”



No comments:
Post a Comment